Origin of International Migrants Residing in Brazil, 2020
WorldGeopoliticalNumber of foreign-born people living in Brazil as of 2015, by country of origin
UNIn 2015, persons from several countries resided in Brazil. Countries with more than 22,500 migrants were the United States, Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay, Argentina, Portugal, Spain, Italy, China, and Japan. Between 16,900 and 22,500 migrants originated from Peru, Chile, and Germany. Between 5,620 and 11,200 migrants originated from Colombia, Angola, United Kingdom, and South Korea. Most of the remaining countries of the world had fewer than 5,620 migrants to Brazil. Countries in this category with at least 3,000 migrants were Mexico, Venezuela, Egypt, the Netherlands, Poland and Switzerland.
Origin of International Migrants Residing in Brazil, 2020 | Origin of International Migrants Residing in Brazil, 2020 | Origin of International Migrants Residing in Brazil, 2020 | Lead Mines | Specialty crop or livestock farming | Mixed farming | Commercial wheat and other small grain farming | Dairy farming | General farming | Livestock ranching | Irrigated agriculture | Mediterranean agriculture (with irrigation) | Nonfarming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hawaii | 1 | ||||||||||||
Alaska | 5 | ||||||||||||
Yukon | 4 | ||||||||||||
Northwest Territories | 1 | ||||||||||||
Nunavut | 1 | ||||||||||||
British Columbia | 6 | ||||||||||||
Newfoundland and Labrador | 1 | ||||||||||||
Arizona | 198 | 55.8% | 1.74% | ||||||||||
Utah | 188 | 80.7% | 5.63% | 1.50% | |||||||||
District of Columbia | 93.5% | 6.49% | |||||||||||
Florida | 52.7% | ||||||||||||
Idaho | 102 | 80.1% | 1.68% | 3.82% | |||||||||
New Hampshire | 94.9% | 5.10% | |||||||||||
Rhode Island | 3.91% | ||||||||||||
Vermont | 99.4% | ||||||||||||
Washington | 27 | 2.54% | 6.88% | 28.9% | 1.54% | ||||||||
Wyoming | 95.3% | 3.25% | |||||||||||
Montana | 96 | 13.8% | 79.9% | 1.03% | |||||||||
Maine | 1 | 11.2% | 78.0% | 10.3% | |||||||||
North Dakota | 97.2% | 2.79% | |||||||||||
Kentucky | 6 | 4.50% | 95.5% | ||||||||||
Nova Scotia | 4 | 36.7% | 19.0% | ||||||||||
Virginia | 1 | 1.66% | 7.48% | 37.3% | |||||||||
Delaware | 99.2% | ||||||||||||
Prince Edward Island | 98.5% | ||||||||||||
Saskatchewan | 1 | 44.8% | |||||||||||
Mississippi | 100% | ||||||||||||
West Virginia | 2.88% | 97.1% | |||||||||||
Nebraska | 46.2% | 15.2% | 29.5% | 3.16% | 1.83% | ||||||||
Texas | 2 | 45.6% | 41.0% | 1.75% | |||||||||
Missouri | 17 | 12.6% | 41.5% | 45.8% | |||||||||
Louisiana | 98.0% | 1.56% | |||||||||||
North Carolina | 2 | 83.7% | 16.0% | ||||||||||
Oregon | 21 | 10.4% | 1.98% | 53.5% | 1.61% | ||||||||
New Brunswick | 5 | 4.59% | 69.9% | 15.9% | 9.03% | ||||||||
Alabama | 100% | ||||||||||||
New Mexico | 49 | 1.35% | 94.7% | 1.16% | |||||||||
Kansas | 1 | 20.9% | 64.6% | 5.63% | 8.39% | ||||||||
Wisconsin | 3.92% | 95.5% | |||||||||||
New Jersey | 65.3% | 34.4% | |||||||||||
South Carolina | 99.9% | ||||||||||||
Michigan | 5.98% | 64.0% | |||||||||||
Alberta | 14.2% | 16.7% | 1.37% | ||||||||||
Connecticut | 99.9% | ||||||||||||
Pennsylvania | 1.55% | 88.8% | 9.67% | ||||||||||
Colorado | 356 | 17.8% | 67.2% | 9.64% | 3.65% | ||||||||
Nevada | 26 | 95.3% | |||||||||||
Massachusetts | 4 | 98.2% | |||||||||||
Georgia | 99.9% | ||||||||||||
New York | 2 | 2.90% | 6.80% | ||||||||||
Maryland | 35.0% | 33.2% | 11.4% | ||||||||||
Québec | 1.00% | 1.28% | |||||||||||
Manitoba | 1 | 14.1% | 4.24% | ||||||||||
Oklahoma | 67.7% | 1.43% | 15.1% | 9.41% | 6.32% | ||||||||
Tennessee | 2 | 42.6% | 57.4% | ||||||||||
Ontario | 7 | 1.82% | 8.82% | 2.80% | |||||||||
California | 45 | 30.0% | 2.07% | 42.1% | 4.51% | ||||||||
Arkansas | 2 | 74.6% | 7.82% | 2.70% | |||||||||
South Dakota | 2 | 25.4% | 18.2% | 56.3% | |||||||||
Ohio | 12.6% | 39.3% | 48.1% | ||||||||||
Indiana | 67.6% | 32.4% | |||||||||||
Minnesota | 17.0% | 7.67% | 56.4% | ||||||||||
Iowa | 99.5% | ||||||||||||
Illinois | 5 | 1.38% | 89.2% | 2.58% | 6.84% | ||||||||
0.18.0