Performance during 2008–2009 Recession (U.S.)
North AmericaEconomicImpact of the 2008–2009 economic recession on selected metropolitan areas of the United States
natureImpact of the 2008–2009 recession in the U.S. with dots indicating performance levels. Darkest blue (strongest) in Washington, D.C., dark blue (second strongest) in Denver, medium blue (moderate) in Chicago, and lightest blue (weakest) in Miami.
Strongest | Second strongest | Middle | Second weakest | Weakest | Canada | Newfoundland | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arizona | 2 | ||||||
Utah | 2 | 1 | |||||
District of Columbia | 1 | ||||||
Florida | 1 | 4 | |||||
Idaho | 1 | ||||||
Washington | 1 | ||||||
Kentucky | 1 | ||||||
Virginia | 1 | ||||||
Mississippi | 1 | ||||||
Texas | 6 | ||||||
Missouri | 1 | ||||||
Louisiana | 1 | 1 | |||||
North Carolina | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Oregon | 1 | ||||||
Alabama | 1 | ||||||
New Mexico | 1 | ||||||
Kansas | 1 | ||||||
Wisconsin | 1 | 1 | |||||
New Jersey | 1 | ||||||
South Carolina | 1 | 2 | |||||
Connecticut | 2 | 1 | |||||
Pennsylvania | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||||
Colorado | 1 | 1 | |||||
Nevada | 1 | ||||||
Massachusetts | 2 | 1 | |||||
Georgia | 1 | 1 | |||||
Maryland | 1 | ||||||
Oklahoma | 2 | ||||||
Tennessee | 1 | 3 | |||||
California | 2 | 7 | |||||
Arkansas | 1 | ||||||
Ohio | 1 | 4 | 2 | ||||
Indiana | 1 | ||||||
Iowa | 2 | ||||||
Illinois | 1 | 1 | |||||
Yukon | 100% | ||||||
Northwest Territories | 98.8% | ||||||
New Hampshire | 0.227% | ||||||
Vermont | 0.301% | ||||||
Nunavut | 97.0% | ||||||
Maine | 1 | 0.770% | |||||
Nova Scotia | 93.4% | ||||||
Prince Edward Island | 61.5% | ||||||
Saskatchewan | 100% | ||||||
New Brunswick | 98.3% | ||||||
British Columbia | 99.0% | ||||||
Newfoundland and Labrador | 1.10% | 97.5% | |||||
Michigan | 2 | 0.112% | |||||
Alberta | 100% | ||||||
New York | 3 | 1 | 0.168% | ||||
Québec | 99.3% | 0.194% | |||||
Manitoba | 99.9% | ||||||
Ontario | 99.9% | ||||||
Minnesota | 1 | 0.161% | |||||
0.16.0