Performance during 2008–2009 Recession (U.S.)
North AmericaEconomicImpact of the 2008–2009 economic recession on selected metropolitan areas of the United States
natureImpact of the 2008–2009 recession in the U.S. with dots indicating performance levels. Darkest blue (strongest) in Washington, D.C., dark blue (second strongest) in Denver, medium blue (moderate) in Chicago, and lightest blue (weakest) in Miami.
Strongest | Second strongest | Middle | Second weakest | Weakest | Herder's Environment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District of Columbia | 1 | |||||
Florida | 1 | 4 | ||||
Kentucky | 1 | |||||
Virginia | 1 | |||||
Mississippi | 1 | |||||
Louisiana | 1 | 1 | ||||
North Carolina | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Alabama | 1 | |||||
Wisconsin | 1 | 1 | ||||
New Jersey | 1 | |||||
South Carolina | 1 | 2 | ||||
Michigan | 2 | |||||
Connecticut | 2 | 1 | ||||
Pennsylvania | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||
Massachusetts | 2 | 1 | ||||
Georgia | 1 | 1 | ||||
New York | 3 | 1 | ||||
Maryland | 1 | |||||
Tennessee | 1 | 3 | ||||
California | 2 | 7 | ||||
Arkansas | 1 | |||||
Ohio | 1 | 4 | 2 | |||
Indiana | 1 | |||||
Illinois | 1 | 1 | ||||
Alaska | 0.152% | |||||
Arizona | 2 | 20.9% | ||||
Utah | 2 | 1 | 84.5% | |||
Yukon | 100% | |||||
Northwest Territories | 0.300% | |||||
Idaho | 1 | 88.8% | ||||
Washington | 1 | 0.612% | ||||
Wyoming | 100% | |||||
Nunavut | 0.580% | |||||
Montana | 100% | |||||
Maine | 1 | 11.9% | ||||
North Dakota | 33.5% | |||||
Saskatchewan | 100% | |||||
Nebraska | 99.5% | |||||
Texas | 6 | 39.6% | ||||
Missouri | 1 | 14.4% | ||||
Oregon | 1 | 3.11% | ||||
New Brunswick | 11.5% | |||||
New Mexico | 1 | 96.3% | ||||
Kansas | 1 | 98.4% | ||||
British Columbia | 0.210% | |||||
Newfoundland and Labrador | 24.2% | |||||
Alberta | 100% | |||||
Colorado | 1 | 1 | 100% | |||
Nevada | 1 | 1.83% | ||||
Québec | 0.452% | |||||
Manitoba | 99.9% | |||||
Oklahoma | 2 | 48.3% | ||||
Ontario | 77.4% | |||||
South Dakota | 27.8% | |||||
Minnesota | 1 | 6.88% | ||||
Iowa | 2 | 29.4% | ||||
0.16.0