Australia

French Polynesia (France)

New Zealand

Solomon Is.

Australia & Oceania

Cuba

Dominican Republic

Haiti

Caribbean

Afghanistan

Kazakhstan

Kyrgyzstan

Tajikistan

Turkmenistan

Uzbekistan

Central Asia

China

Hong Kong S.A.R. (China)

Japan

Mongolia

Nepal

South Korea

Taiwan

East Asia

Armenia

Azerbaijan

Georgia

Russia

Eurasia

Albania

Austria

Belarus

Belgium

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Bulgaria

Croatia

Cyprus

Czechia

Denmark

France

Germany

Greece

Hungary

Italy

Kosovo

Malta

Moldova

Montenegro

Netherlands

Northern Macedonia

Norway

Poland

Portugal

Romania

Serbia

Slovakia

Slovenia

Spain

Sweden

Switzerland

Ukraine

United Kingdom

Europe

Argentina

Bolivia

Brazil

Chile

Colombia

Costa Rica

Ecuador

El Salvador

Guatemala

Honduras

Nicaragua

Panama

Paraguay

Peru

Suriname

Uruguay

Venezuela

Latin America

Mauritania

Mauritius

None

Canada

Mexico

United States

North America

Bangladesh

India

Maldives

Pakistan

Sri Lanka

South Asia

Indonesia

Malaysia

Myanmar

Thailand

Vietnam

Southeast Asia

Algeria

Bahrain

Egypt

Iran

Iraq

Israel

Jordan

Kuwait

Lebanon

Libya

Morocco

Oman

Palestine

Syria

Tunisia

Turkey

Yemen

Southwest Asia and North Africa

Angola

Benin

Burkina Faso

Cameroon

Central African Republic

Chad

Comoros

Côte d'Ivoire

Democratic Republic of Congo

eSwatini

Ethiopia

Gabon

Gambia

Ghana

Guinea

Kenya

Liberia

Madagascar

Malawi

Mali

Mozambique

Namibia

Niger

Nigeria

Senegal

Sierra Leone

Somalia

South Africa

Sudan

Togo

Uganda

Zimbabwe

Sub-Saharan Africa

<p>Mass protests globally, with dark green indicating more than 10 protests in the U S, Brazil, Pakistan, France, Spain, and India. Light green indicates 0 to 1 protests in Afghanistan and in some African nations, including Zimbabwe, Namibia, and Algeria.</p>

<p>The number of protests with a peak size over 100,000 per country, 2019-2023</p>

Countries

World

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Mass Protests

Protests

The map shows striking regional differences in the percentage of change in the population of counties in the United States between 2000 and 2010. In the Northeast and Midwest, most counties either had small gains of between 0 and 4.9 percent or lost between 0 and –5 percent. In a few counties in upstate New York, western Pennsylvania, eastern Ohio, and parts of northern Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota, losses exceeded 5 percent. Western Ohio, northern Indiana, much of Illinois, and eastern Iowa experienced modest declines of between 0 and –5 percent. At the same time, population increased by 5 to 14.9 percent in southern Minnesota, Wisconsin, Missouri, and parts of Indiana and Ohio. In the South, many areas showed strong growth—from 5 to 14.9 percent and higher—including Maryland, Virginia, Delaware, North Carolina, Georgia, Florida, and Tennessee. Counties lost population (between 0 and –5 percent, with significant numbers of counties less than –5 percent) in West Virginia, eastern Kentucky, Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, and northern Louisiana. From the Northern Plains to Texas, a vast area of rural counties lost significant numbers of residents—declines of more than –5 percent in many counties. This population loss is most evident in eastern Montana, North and South Dakota, Nebraska, western Iowa, Kansas, southeastern Wyoming, Colorado, and West Texas. In contrast, counties in the Rocky Mountains, Great Basin, and Southwest often experienced strong growth—from 5 to 14.9 percent and higher—as exemplified by western Montana, southern Idaho, most of Wyoming and Colorado, parts of New Mexico, much of Nevada, and virtually all of Utah and Arizona. The Pacific coast states of Washington, Oregon, and California also grew, except for eastern Oregon, which saw declines from 0 to –5 percent and less. Hawaii’s population grew by more than 14.9 percent. In Alaska, the counties around Anchorage and Fairbanks also made strong gains, whereas other counties declined or grew slightly.

Mass Protests			Countries	Deforestation: Net Loss, 2000-2015	Male-Female Ratio
Class	Rank	Protests	Population Change 2000–2010 (U.S.)	Deforestation: Net Loss, 2000-2015	Class	Rank	Ratio of males to females
				1.82%
				24.2%

				7.42%
				2.09%
				6.73%
				29.1%
				41.1%
				2.29%
				4.39%
				12.6%
				1.50%
				31.3%

MapMaster 3

Mass Protests